Liquidity is assessed either by net working capital (fund flow) or by cash and cash equivalents (cash flow). NWC shows the structural position of current assets and liabilities, while cash-flow analysis reveals timing and convertibility. Modern treasury practices combine both views - using forecasts, short-term investments, and systems - to manage timing differences and preserve operational flexibility.
Why liquidity still matters
Sufficient liquidity remains essential for businesses as transaction volumes, payment methods, and intercompany activity grow. Liquidity determines a firm's ability to meet short-term obligations, manage payment timing, and seize short-term opportunities without disrupting operations.
Two common concepts of liquidity
Net working capital (fund flow) approach
One traditional way to view liquidity is through net working capital (NWC): current assets minus current liabilities. Analysts who use this perspective focus on how funds move between balance-sheet items over an accounting period. A fund flow statement (sometimes an older term) highlights changes in NWC and helps managers understand how different financing and operating decisions affect the company's overall liquid resources.
Cash and cash equivalents (cash flow) approach
The other common approach measures liquidity as the cash and cash equivalents on hand. Cash equivalents typically include short-term, highly liquid investments such as Treasury bills, money market funds, and other marketable securities that can be converted to cash quickly with minimal value change. A cash flow statement reports actual cash receipts and payments during a period. That analysis shows liquidity impacts that NWC alone can miss - for example, converting receivables to cash improves the cash position without changing NWC.
How these approaches differ in practice
NWC analysis tracks the net position of current accounts and is useful for assessing overall working-capital sufficiency and financing needs. Cash-flow analysis captures the timing and direction of cash movements, which is critical when the timing of receipts and payments creates short-term stress even if NWC looks adequate.
For example, collecting accounts receivable reduces receivables and increases cash, leaving NWC unchanged but improving immediate cash availability. Conversely, taking on short-term debt increases both cash and current liabilities and can temporarily improve cash while reducing other measures of liquidity.
Modern implications for managers
Today, companies combine both perspectives. Treasury teams monitor cash balances, short-term investments, and intraday liquidity while finance teams review NWC drivers such as inventory turnover and payables days. Tools such as cash forecasting, rolling liquidity models, and treasury management systems help manage timing differences and reduce reliance on expensive emergency financing.
Practical takeaways
- Use NWC analysis to assess structural working-capital needs and financing strategy.
- Use cash-flow analysis to manage timing, buffer for volatility, and optimize short-term investments.
- Monitor the cash conversion cycle (receivables, inventory, payables) to identify operational levers that affect liquidity.
- Combine forecasts, short-term investments, and bank facilities to maintain an appropriate liquidity buffer.
FAQs about Liquidity
What is the difference between net working capital and cash liquidity?
Why can cash improve without changing net working capital?
Which analysis should managers use to avoid short-term cash stress?
What are common cash equivalents?
News about Liquidity
Solana Liquidity Plummets to Bear Level Territory Amid $500M Liquidation Overhang - Decrypt [Visit Site | Read More]
Crypto’s Liquidity Engine Breaks Down With $5 Billion ETF Exodus - Bloomberg.com [Visit Site | Read More]
Fed says it will start technical buying of Treasury bills to manage market liquidity - Reuters [Visit Site | Read More]
China Yield Curve Seen Steepening on Politburo Liquidity Support - Bloomberg.com [Visit Site | Read More]