Umbilical cord blood provides hematopoietic stem cells used to treat leukemia, aplastic anemia, metabolic and immune disorders. Advantages include ready availability and lower chronic GVHD rates; limits include cell dose for adults. Solutions include double-unit grafts and laboratory expansion methods. Haploidentical transplants and other donor sources now influence clinical choice. Public banking supports unrelated transplants; private banking is generally reserved for particular family risks.
What cord blood transplantation treats
Umbilical cord blood remains an established source of hematopoietic (blood-forming) stem cells used to treat leukemia, lymphoma, severe aplastic anemia, inherited metabolic disorders, and primary immune deficiencies. Clinicians still consider cord blood when a bone marrow or peripheral blood donor is not available or when a quick transplant is needed.Why cord blood is different
Cord blood units contain hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells collected at birth and stored in public or private banks. Because units are cryopreserved and HLA-typed in advance, an unrelated cord unit can often be delivered to a transplant center within days to a couple of weeks - faster than the time it can take to identify, screen, and mobilize an unrelated adult donor.Cord blood transplants historically have produced lower rates and severity of graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) than unrelated adult donor transplants, while still offering graft-versus-leukemia effects. That relative reduction in chronic GVHD remains one of cord blood's clinical advantages.
The cell-dose challenge and solutions
A practical limitation of single cord units is cell dose: a single unit often contains enough cells for infants and small children but may be insufficient for many adults. Several strategies have been developed:- Double cord blood transplantation - giving two partially matched units at once - became a common approach for larger recipients.
- Ex vivo expansion - laboratory techniques that increase the number of stem/progenitor cells in a unit before infusion.
- Reduced-intensity conditioning and other regimen adaptations to extend the applicability of cord units to larger or older patients.
How cord blood compares to other donor sources today
In the last decade, haploidentical (half-matched family) transplants using post-transplant cyclophosphamide have become a widely available alternative for adults, which has influenced how often cord blood is chosen. Clinicians weigh speed of availability, HLA match, cell dose, patient size, and center experience when deciding between cord blood, haploidentical, unrelated marrow, or peripheral blood donors. 1Banking choices and practical advice
Public cord blood banks make units available to any compatible patient; public banking supports unrelated transplants and research. Private (family) banking stores units for potential autologous or sibling use; routine private banking for speculative future use is not recommended by many professional societies unless there is a known family need.If your doctor suggests a transplant, ask about all donor options (related, unrelated, cord blood, haploidentical), timelines for finding a donor, and whether your center participates in cord blood expansion trials or uses double-unit grafts.
- Confirm regulatory approvals and specific product names for ex vivo expanded cord blood products (for example, omidubicel/NiCord/Gamida Cell) and current approval status (FDA, EMA).
- Verify clinical adoption trends and comparative usage statistics: cord blood vs haploidentical transplants in adults since 2015-2025.
- Confirm details and timelines for major ex vivo expansion approaches that reached late-stage clinical trials (names of molecules/technologies and trial outcomes).